GYANENDRA SWARUP SAXENA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. TRANSPORT DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/3954/2025 · 2025-04-11
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132407 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132407 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20836 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3954 of 2025 Petitioner :- Gyanendra Swarup Saxena Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anchal Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Ms Anchal Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Raghvendra Pratap Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State-opposite party and Ms. Aditi Shree, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 to 5.
2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main reliefs:-
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opp. parties concerned to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 04.11.2024 as per law within stipulated time period, in the interest of justice."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.4 and this Court may direct opposite party no.4 to pass appropriate
order strictly in accordance with law.
4. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued.
5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no. 4 i.e. General Manager (Karmik) UPSRTC, Headquarter, Lucknow taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, along with certified copy of this order within a period of fifteen days from today. If such a representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of ten weeks from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith.
6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is
disposed of finally.
Order Date :- 11.4.2025. Rks. Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench