MUKESH v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (NYAYIK), AYODHYA MANDAL, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/1916/2025 · 2025-04-07
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132368 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132368 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19379 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1916 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mukesh Respondent :- Additional Commissioner (Nyayik), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private- respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):-
"To direct the Additional Commissioner (Nyayik) Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya to decide the Appeal No. 1643/2024 namely "Ramdash and others Vs. Malti @ Nirmala and others" pending before Additional Commissioner (Nyayik) Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya since 15/07/2024 (annexure no. 1), expeditiously preferable within a stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice." Taking note of Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, as per which, revision or appeal should preferably be decided preferably within six months, however, in the instant case, the appeal is pending since July, 2024 and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioner, as stated, is suffering great hardship and mental agony, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1/Additional Commissioner (Nyayik), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya to consider and decide the Appeal No. 1643/2024 (Ramdash and others Vs. Malti @ Nirmala and others) most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 7.4.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench