AKASH KUMAR BHARTI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/3717/2025 · 2025-04-09
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132347 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132347 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19961 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3717 of 2025 Petitioner :- Akash Kumar Bharti Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Urban Development Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arjun Kumar Kaushal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Namit Sharma Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Heard Sri Arjun Kumar Kaushal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ram Kumar Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for the opposite parties no. 1 and 2 and Sri Krishna Kumar Pandey, Advocate who has filed 'Vakalatnama' on behalf of opposite parties no. 3 and 4, same is taken on record. By means of this petition the petitioner has prayed following relief :
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction or the nature of mandamus, thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties to appoint the petitioner on suitable post in the department and also pay the retiral dues of Late Ram chander after deciding the application of the petitioner dated 20.03.2025 contained in Annexure no. 2 to this writ petition."
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that ends of justice would suffice if he is allowed to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 3 and the same may be directed to dispose it of with speaking and reasoned order within stipulated time. With the consent of parties the writ petition is disposed of finally at the admission stage. Without entering into the merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within 15 days before the opposite party no. 3 i.e. Nagar Ayukt, Nagar Nigam, Lucknow taking all his pleas and grounds and enclosing his earlier representations along with all relevant documents. If such a representation is moved the opposite party concerned is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner with speaking and reasoned order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, strictly in accordance with law expeditiously, say within a period of two months from the date of production of the certified copy of this order. The decision on the representation shall be communicated to the petitioner forthwith. Writ petition is finally disposed of. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.]
Order Date :- 9.4.2025/Om Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench