Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:27139] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12862/2018 Smt. Pushpa Devi Birla W/o Shri Basantraj Birla, R.i 41/12 Varun Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus Manish S/o Anil Mehta, Commercial Address 104/138, Mansarover, Jaipur, R/o 22/5/3, Madhyam Marg, Mansarover, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Vishal Soni & Dr.Nitin Soni For Respondent(s) : Mr.O. P. Mishra JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 21/07/2025
1. By way of filing this writ petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned order dated 09.05.2018 passed by the Rent Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as “the Tribunal”) by which the application submitted by the petitioner under Section 19(A) of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 (for short, “the Act of 2001) has been partly allowed.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the main petition submitted by the petitioner under Section 6/9 of the Act of 2001 has already been dismissed as default, hence, the present writ petition has become infructuous.
3. Considering the above, this writ petition is rendered as infructuous. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to move an application for revival of this writ petition, in case, the main
[2025:RJ-JP:27139] (2 of 2) [CW-12862/2018] application submitted by the petitioner under Section 9 of the Act of 2009 is restored to its original number.
4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /64