DEENA NATH PATHAK AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/3305/2025 · 2025-04-16
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132332 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132332 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21245-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3305 of 2025 Petitioner :- Deena Nath Pathak And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Pathak,Prakash Arvind,Uday Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. The petitioners seek certain correction in the Gharauni, as according to them, name of only one of the siblings has been recorded therein i.e. opposite party no. 6, leaving out the petitioners and others. The petitioners had moved an application, as claimed, within the stipulated period under Rule 29 of the U.P. Gharauni (Rural Abadi Record) Manual, and a survey was also got conducted, but thereafter, the matte has remained pending. Learned Standing Counsel says that the application was not given within time. It is not for us to decide such matters. Let the competent authority under the Manual aforesaid look into the matter and ascertain as to whether the correction was sought within a period of 15 days, as stipulated. If so, then he shall do the needful unless there is any legal impediment. However, if he finds that it is not so, then, he shall inform the petitioners in writing whereupon they shall avail the remedies, as may be prescribed. We have also been informed that some suit for partition has been filed by the opposite party no. 6 wherein the petitioner is a defendant. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 16.4.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench