M/S PAWANSUT CONSTRUCTION THRU ONE OF ITS DIRECTORS MR.ABHISHEK KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/3337/2025 · 2025-04-30
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132328 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132328 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24880-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3337 of 2025 Petitioner :- M/S Pawansut Construction Thru One Of Its Directors Mr.Abhishek Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Public Works Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nirmit Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. (C.M. Application No.2 of 2025)
1. This is an application for amendment.
2. Heard.
3. Application for amendment is allowed.
4. Let necessary amendment be carried out during course of the day. (Order on petition)
5. Petitioner's grievance is that at the time the work was carried out for Public Works Department of the Government of U.P., GST was paid by the petitioner @12 per cent which was reimbursed by the opposite parties, however, subsequently, the rate of tax was enhanced, therefore, the difference of GST amount based on the 6 per cent difference in the rate is liable to be reimbursed to the petitioner.
6. In view of the aforesaid, let the petitioner approach opposite party no.6 who may get the facts verified and take a decision as to the claim of the petitioner within two months.
7. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
8. If ultimately it is found that the amount claimed is payable to the petitioner then the same shall be paid within the said period otherwise a reasoned decision shall be communicated. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 30.4.2025/Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench