AMAR NATH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WPIL/330/2025 · 2025-04-08
Pankaj Bhatia
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132325 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132325 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19606 Court No. - 6 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 330 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amar Nath Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailendra Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following relief:
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents particularly the respondent no-2 to 4 to take appropriate steps for removal of illegal encroachment made by the respondent no-6 and 7 over Chak Marg i.e. Gata No-491 situated at village -Sarai Govind Rai, Tehsil pargana and District - Pratapgarh."
3. Learned Standing Counsel, based upon the instructions, states that an order under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is also passed. For compliance of the said order, Clause 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual prescribes for execution of such orders.
4. In view thereof, the present petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to avail the remedy by moving an appropriate application under Clause 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual. In case, such an application is filed, the same shall be
disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 8.4.2025 Ashutosh Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench