Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 132323 (ALL)

VIJAY KRISHNA MATHUR v. UNION OF INDIA PUNJAB AND SIND BANK NEW DELHI THRU. MD AND CEO AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/3756/2025 · 2025-04-08

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19733 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3756 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vijay Krishna Mathur Respondent :- Union Of India Punjab And Sind Bank New Delhi Thru. Md And Ceo And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar,Charan Singh,Rajesh Kumar Kashyap Counsel for Respondent :- Sharad Kumar Shukla Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Pramod Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sharad Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the opposite parties. 2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed the following main relief:- "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the impugned transfer of services dated 13.02.2025 passed by the Competent Authority from the Zonal Office Lucknow to Branch Vikas Nagar, Lucknow contained as Annexure No. 1 in the interest of justice (ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Opposite Party No. 2 and 3 to grant the special leave for the period in question as a relief measure in the interest of justice." 3. At the very out set , Sri Sharad Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the opposite parties has raised an objection on the ground that the petitioner has been shifted from one bank to another bank within 5 kilometers distance and considering the disability condition of the petitioner, he is shifted to a bank which is having comfortable condition. He has further submitted that this is not a case whereas the petitioner who is said to be disable person having disability of 60% has been shifted to any remote place but has been shifted from Jankipuram Branch, Lucknow to Vikas Nagar Branch, Lucknow. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has preferred a representation against the aforesaid transfer order. 5. On that Sri Shukla has stated that the representation has been considered and turned down by the Bank vide order dated 25.02.2025 (Annexnore No.4.). 6. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is ready to submit his joining at the transferred place i.e. Vikas Nagar Branch, Lucknow . 7. Considering the aforesaid submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to submit his joining at the transferred place i.e. Vikas Nagar Branch, Lucknow within a week from today. . (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Order Date :- 8.4.2025 dk/ Digitally signed by :- DEVENDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench