Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13229 (JHR)

GULAB SAW ALIAS GULAB PRASAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4162/2025 · 2025-06-13

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:15541 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4162 of 2025 ------ Gulab Saw @ Gulab Prasad, aged about 31 years, son of Manohar Saw, R/o Village Murup, P.O. Murup, P.S. Latehar, District –Latehar. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mrs. Renu Bala, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 13.06.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No.57 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 191(2), 191(3), 118(1), 117(2), 109(1) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned P.P. appearing for the State files a counter affidavit. Keep the same in the record. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was the member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly attempted to murder the son of the informant with stone, danda (sticks), hands and legs. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner are general and omnibus in nature and there is no allegation against the petitioner of using any dangerous weapon. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 11.03.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 12.06.2025 in B.A. No. 4014 of 2025. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar, in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No.57 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/