Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13229 (AP)

M.Mohan Kumar, v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/6872/2019 · 2025-08-12

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010158112019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6872/2019 Between: 1. M.MOHAN KUMAR, S/O.VENKATESWARULU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC JUNIOR ASSISTANT IN SRI MALLIKARJUNA SWAMY KAMAKSHI TAYEE TEMPLE, ZANNAWADA(V), BUCHIREDDIPALEM(M), S.P.S.R.NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REVENUE(ENDOWMENTS) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. SRI MALLIKARJUNA SWAMY KAMAKSHI TAYEE TEMPLE, ZANNAWADA (V), BUCHIREDDIPALEM (M), S. P. S . R. NELLORE DISTRICT. REP.BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. J U M V PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 2. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.6872 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing the proceedings in Rc.No.A3/47/2018, dated 25-01-2019 as bad, illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, violative of principles of natural justice, in- subordination and violative of Articles 14, 21 of Constitution of India consequently set aside the proceedings in Rc.No.A3/47/2018, dated 25-01-2019 and to pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri J.U.M.V.Prasad, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Government Pleader for Endowments is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 13.08.2025 Pmk 3 11 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:6872 OF 2019 Date: 13.08.2025 Pmk