SAURABH v. STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARY HOME AT LUCKNOW
BAIL/2903/2025 · 2025-02-13
Krishan Pahal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13229 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13229 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:21236 Court No. - 65 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2903 of 2025 Applicant :- Saurabh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Through Secretary Home At Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Anurag Sharma, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of applicant appointed by the High Court Legal Services Committee, and Sri J.K. Chaurasia, learned State Law Officer and perused the material placed on record. 3. By means of the present bail application, the applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 125 of 2024, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Khatauli, District- Muzaffarnagar, during the pendency of trial. 4. It is argued by the learned Advocate that the prosecution under the Gangsters Act have been launched against the applicant on the basis of three criminal cases shown in the gang chart. The details of criminal cases have been mentioned in paragraphs 8,9 and 10 of the affidavit accompanying the bail application. He has been falsely implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. He is not the member of any gang. It is further stated that there is no other criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 25.3.2024. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned State Law Officer opposed the prayer for bail but has not disputed the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Saurabh involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a
personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :- i. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Identity and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. 8. The copy of the bail order be sent to the District Legal Service Authority, Muzaffarnagar. 9. The fees may be paid to Sri Anurag Sharma, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of applicant appointed by the High Court Legal Services Committee, as per rules of the High Court. Order Date :- 14.2.2025 Shalini (Justice Krishan Pahal) Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad