Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 132247 (ALL)

SATROHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/3362/2025 · 2025-04-08

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19771-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3362 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satrohan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. The list of fresh cases has been revised. Heard. The application of the petitioner allegedly under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is not in terms of the requirements of Rule 22 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, therefore, the petitioner should submit a fresh application accordingly, as per law, whereupon, the needful shall be done, if there is a cause and if the application is maintainable, by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate concerned. The petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 8.4.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench