Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 132236 (ALL)

NITIN DIXIT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPTT. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/3668/2025 · 2025-04-07

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19428 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3668 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nitin Dixit Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Irrigation And Water Resources Deptt. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhagwati Prasad Nigam,Anurag Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Jogendra Nath Verma Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Heard Sri B.P. Nigam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Meena Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. Notice on behalf of opposite party no. 2 has been accepted by Sri Jogendra Nath Verma, Advocate. By means of this petition the petitioner has prayed following relief : "I. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing to the opposite party no. 2 to consider the grievances of the petitioner and make payment of promotional pay scale as well as all increments including arrears of his late father namely Dinesh Kumar Dixit who was holding the post of Draftsman in the interest of justice. П- To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing to the opposite party no. 2, to decide the application/representation regarding the grievances of the petitioner contained as Annexure no. 6 to this writ petition in the interest of justice. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that ends of justice would suffice if he is allowed to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 2 and the same may be directed to dispose it of with speaking and reasoned order within stipulated time. With the consent of parties the writ petition is disposed of finally at the admission stage. Without entering into the merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within 15 days before the opposite party no. 2 i.e. Adhyaksh Evam Prashashak, Greator Sharda Kshetra, Vikash Pradhikari / Pariyojna, Lucknow taking all his pleas and grounds and enclosing his earlier representations along with all relevant documents. If such a representation is moved the opposite party concerned is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner with speaking and reasoned order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, strictly in accordance with law expeditiously, say within a period of two months from the date of production of the certified copy of this order. The decision on the representation shall be communicated to the petitioner forthwith. Writ petition is finally disposed of. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.] Order Date :- 7.4.2025 Om Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench