SUSHEELA CHAUDHARY AND OTHERS v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (ADMINISTRATION), AYODHYA DIVISION, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/1931/2025 · 2025-04-08
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132226 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132226 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19559 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1931 of 2025 Petitioner :- Susheela Chaudhary And Others Respondent :- Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned State counsel. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):-
"a. Direct the Opposite Party No. 1 to decide the Appeal No. 501/2015, computerized case no. C-2015040000501 namely "Lal Chand versus Kamla Prasad" Under Section 331(3) U.P.Z.A &L.R Act 1950 relating to Village- Baragaon, Pargana-Surhurpur, Tehsil-Jalalpur, District Ambedkar Nagar expeditiously as fixed period by this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of Justice." Taking note of para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, as per which, an appeal or revision should preferably be decided within a period of six months, however, in the instant case, the appeal is pending since 2015 and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioners, as stated, are suffering great hardship and mental agony, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1/Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to consider and decide the Appeal/Case No. 501/2015, Computerized Case No. C-2015040000501 (Lal Chand versus Kamla Prasad) most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 8.4.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench