Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13217 (AP)

PADILAM SITAYAMMA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/8356/2025 · 2025-06-17

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARA (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 835fi OF 2025 Between: 1. Padilam Sitayamma, W/o Late Sri Suryanarayana, Age 80 Years House Wife, R/o Door No. , Occ 531 126, 1-1, P. Lakshmipuram Payakaraopeta Mandal, Anakapalli District 2. Medisetti Appayamma @ Lakshmi, W/o Late Sri Appala Raju Age 60 Years. Occ House Wife, R/o Door No. 1-1, P. Lakshmipuram - 531 126, Payakaraopeta Mandal, Anakapalli District ...PETITIONER AND rep. by its PrI. Secretary, Revenue (Lands - IV) Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi - 522 237, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh 2. The District Collector, Anakapalli District, Anakapalli - 531 001 3. The Joint Collector, Anakapalli District, Anakapalli - 531 001 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Narsipatnam - 531 116 5. The Tahsildar, Payakaraopeta - 531 126, Anakapalli District 6. Padilam Venkateswara Rao, S/o Sri Narayya Dora R/o Door No. 7-74, Pallapu Veedhi,Chebrolu - 533 449, Gollaprolu Mandal, Kakinada District 7. Padilam Appanna Babu,S/o Sri Narayya Dora, R/o Door No. 7-74, Pallapu Veedhi, Chebrolu - 533 449, Gollaprolu Mandal, Kakinada District // ...RESPONDENTS r Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution Of India praying that in the j. the High Court may be or Direction more particularly action of the 4th and 5th circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the respondent authorities incorporating the name of the 6th respondent in Form 1.B Register and Adangai as Pattadar in respect of the iands of P,c. 7.183 Cents in Sy.No. 60/2A and an extent of an extent of Ac. 0.399 Cents in Sy No 60/2G and an extent of Ac. 2.91 in Sy.No. 62/1C in Namavaram Viiiage, as illegal, arbitrary and in consequently direct the name of the 6th Respondent as pattadar payakaraopeta Mandal, in Anakapalli District violation of Principles of natural justice and respondents herein to remove the from the revenue records forthwith. |A MO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC the affidavit filed i praying that in the circumstances stated in support of the writ petition, the High Court pleased to direct the Respondent authorities in may be to keep the lands of an extent of ^c. 7.183 Cents in Sy.No. 60/2A and an extent of Ac. 0.399 Cents in Sy No 60/2G and an extent of Ac. 2.91 in Sy.No. 62/1C in Nantavaram Village payakaraopeta Mandal, Anakapalli District in dispute register as per the orders of the 3rd respondent dated 03-03-2017, pending disposal of the present Writ p0tition. counsel for the Petitioner(s);SRI N SIVA counsel for the Respondents No. counsel for the Respondents No.6,7: l-pe Court made the following: ORDER REDDY 1 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE APHC010158992025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 7 J [3329] / WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the honourable SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 8356/2025 Between: Padilam Sitayamma and others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and others Counsel for the Petitioner(S); 1.N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1 GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT{S) 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 8356/2Q2fi ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the Government Pleader for the respondents. petitioners and learned Assistant 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri N. Siva Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he filed the Registry seeking withdrawal of the present Writ Petition. a memo dated 16.06.2025 in 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. V u Sd/- P. VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to SRI. N SIVA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 2. TwoCCsto GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court Of Andhra 3. Three CD Copies Pradesh. [OUT] nm • HIGH COURT DATED: 18/06/2025 ORDER WP.No.8356 of 2025 0 'I AUG 2025 p ntSectioftXj o Co DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS