TIRATH RAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND 7 OTHERS
A227/1911/2025 · 2025-04-07
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132138 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132138 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19406 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1911 of 2025 Petitioner :- Tirath Ram Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sukhveer Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Arun Kumar Maurya, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondent and Shri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for Gaon Sabha. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought following main relief(s) :-
"I. To issue an order or direction to opposite party no. 4 i.e. Tehsillar, Tehsil Baksi Ka Talab, District Lucknow to Register and decide the case Under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code- 2006, pending before him since 23.12.2024 (Tirath Ram vs Satgur and others), expeditiously preferably withing stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble Court. II. To issue an order or direction to the opposite party no. 3 and 4 to remove the encroachment done by the opposite parties no. 5, 6 and 7 on the both side the lane/Street (Shown in the Map) by blocking the street, in the Village Kaudiamau, Police Station Gudamba, Tehsil Baksi Ka Talab, District Lucknow, by which the petitioner and his family may use the street for ingress and egress from his house." Shri Arun Kumar Maurya, learned Standing Counsel for State- respondent, based upon the instructions received, stated that the case has already been registered as T202510460409701 (Gram Sabha Vs. Satguru), under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and the same shall be decided most expeditously, as per law, after taking note of the
facts of the case as also the order dated 16.01.2025 passed by Board of Revenue in Revision No. REV/2827/2024/Lucknow, annexed at page- 89 of the paper-book.. In view of above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.3-Tehsildar, Baksi Ka Talab, Lucknow to consider and decide the Case, detailed above, most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably
within a period of three months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 7.4.2025 Mohit Singh/- Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench