Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13213 (GAU)

ANURUDH CHOUHAN v. SURENDRA CHAUHAN AND 6 ORS.

CRP(IO)/191/2025 · 2025-05-29

Devashis Baruah

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010113522025 2025:GAU-AS:6988 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP(IO)/191/2025 ANURUDH CHOUHAN S/O LT. RAMCHUK CHOUHAN, R/O RAMNAGAR, P.O.- RAMNAGAR, P.S.- HOWRAGHAT, DIST- EAST KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM, PIN-782481 VERSUS SURENDRA CHAUHAN AND 6 ORS. S/O LT. RAMCHUK CHOUHAN, R/O RAMNAGAR, MOUZA- LANGFER, P.S.- HOWRAGHAT, DIST- KARBI NAGLONG, ASSAM, PIN-782481 2:ON THE DEATH OF ADESH CHAUHAN HIS LEGAL HEIRS NAMELY 2.1:SMTI PARBATI DEVI W/O LT. ADESH CHAUHAN R/O RAMNAGAR P.O.- RAMNAGAR P.S.- HOWRAGHAT DIST- EAST KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM PIN-782481 2.2:SANTOSH CHAUHAN S/O LT. ADESH CHAUHAN C/O SMTI. PARBATI DEVI R/O RAMNAGAR P.O.- RAMNAGAR P.S.- HOWRAGHAT DIST- EAST KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM PIN-782481 Page No.# 2/4 2.3:SMTI SARASWATI DEVI D/O LT. ADESH CHAUHAN C/O SMTI. PARBATI DEVI R/O RAMNAGAR P.O.- RAMNAGAR P.S.- HOWRAGHAT DIST- EAST KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM PIN-782481 2.4:SMTI SUGEE DEVI D/O LT. ADESH CHAUHAN C/O SMTI. PARBATI DEVI R/O RAMNAGAR P.O.- RAMNAGAR P.S.- HOWRAGHAT DIST- EAST KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM PIN-782481 2.5:JITENDRA CHAUHAN S/O LT. ADESH CHAUHAN C/O SMTI. PARBATI DEVI R/O RAMNAGAR P.O.- RAMNAGAR P.S.- HOWRAGHAT DIST- EAST KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM PIN-782481 2.6:SMTI RAJMATI DEVI D/O LT. ADESH CHAUHAN C/O SMTI. PARBATI DEVI R/O RAMNAGAR P.O.- RAMNAGAR P.S.- HOWRAGHAT DIST- EAST KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM PIN-78248 Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. S Chauhan Page No.# 3/4 Advocate for the respondent(s): B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 30.05.2025 Heard Mr. S Chauhan, the learned counsel for the petitioner who submits that pursuant to the order dated 11.04.2025, the Assistant Settlement Officer Phuloni Circle had already been examined as a Court-Witness, therefore, nothing further remains in the instant petition. He, however, submits that the petitioner should be granted an opportunity to cross examine the Court-Witness, if any statements are made which goes against the interest of the petitioner. 2. It is the opinion of this Court that if the petitioner wants to cross examine the Court-Witness, an application is required to be filed before the said Court. 3. Taking into the account that the statement of the Assistant Settlement Officer Phuloni Circle had already been recorded, nothing further remains in the instant proceedings. Be that as it may, the petitioner would be at liberty to file an application for cross examination of the said Court-Witness. The Court of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) Karbi Anglong shall duly consider the same. 4. With the above, the instant petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Page No.# 4/4 Comparing Assistant