Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19512 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3683 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mayawati Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy./Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Agriculture Education/Research Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kripa Shankar Shukla,Ramesh Babu Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Kripa Shankar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Brajendra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent and Sri Satyanshu Ojha, learned counsel, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party Nos.2 and 3, the same is taken on record. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay the petitioner the arrears of differences of minimum of regular pay scale for Class-IV post of her husband as admissible to him as per VII Pay Commission Report w.e.f. 01.01.2016 till the date of death i.e. 21.12.2022 of her husband Mansha Ram after adjusting/ reducing the amount already paid to her husband as per VI Pay Commission Report, in the interest of justice." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of her grievance, the petitioner has preferred a representation dated 24.02.2025 to the opposite party Nos.3, but no decision has been taken on the same till date. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, she may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority and direction may be issued him/her to consider and decide the said representation within a stipulated time. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has stated that he has no objection if direction is issued to the Competent Authority to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners within a stipulated time. 6. In view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage permitting the petitioner to prefer afresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e. the Vice- Chancellor, Narendra Dev University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, District-Faizabad taking all pleas and grounds which are available with her annexing therewith copy of her earlier representation, if any, and the relevant documents in support of her claim within a period of fifteen days from today, and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition preferably within a period of two months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order along with representation and the decision thereof be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 7. It is needless to say that if there is no legal impediment, the grievance of the petitioners may be redressed in the aforesaid stipulated time. 8. In view of the aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 7.4.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench