- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1190 RFA No. 76 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 76 OF 2023 (POS) BETWEEN: SMT.SHYAMALA W/O SEETHARAM, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, (R/AT NO.24 (29/640/24), SITED AT EAST SANJIVINI NAGAR, HEGGANAHALLI CROSS, BENGALURU-560 091. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. KESHAVA MURTHY.B., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: SMT. M.N.NAGAVENI W/O M.H.MOHAN, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.48, 2ND CROSS, LAKSHMANAGAR, SANJIVINI NAGAR, HEGGANAHALLI CROSS, VISHWANEEDAM (PO), BENGALURU-560 091. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. GANGADHARAIAH.A.N., ADVOCATE C/R) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1190 RFA No. 76 of 2023 ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 06.01.2025, on that day, when the case was called, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. However, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the appeal under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non- compliance of office objections’. The appeal is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the appellant has not complied with the office objections. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. In view of peremptory order dated 06.01.2025, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10