2025:HHC:20839 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Exe. Pt. No. 143 of 2024 Decided on : 02.07.2025 Rattan Chand. …Petitioner Versus Sh. Rohan Chand Thakur, Managing Director. …Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Surinder Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Rahul, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the considered view that as the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Coordinate Bench stands complied with by the respondent, by passing an appropriate order, grievance of the petitioner, which arises as being not satisfied by the order passed by the Authority, cannot be redressed by way of execution petition and for that the petitioner will have to come by way of a fresh writ petition. 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:20839 2. Accordingly, as prayed for, these proceedings are closed, but with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition, if he is not satisfied by the order passed by the Authority, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 02, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)