Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 132082 (ALL)

VINEET KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/3734/2025 · 2025-04-07

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19363 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3734 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vineet Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 to 3. By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to fix any other date for physical test examination of UP Police Radio Assistant Operator Direct Recruitment-2022 to the petitioner which was scheduled on 11.03.2025 at about 5:00 AM, (contained as Annexure No.1) in the interest of justice." After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer to the extent that the representation of the petitioner may be directed to be decided by respondent no.2. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to this innocuous prayer. Perused the record. Considering the above, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation to respondent no.2 i.e. Uttar Pradesh Police Recruitment and Promotion Board, Lucknow through it's Chairman within two weeks' from today. If the petitioner submits a fresh representation, the respondent no.2 shall decide the same within four weeks' thereafter, by passing a speaking and reasoned order. Order Date :- 7.4.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench