2025:HHC:131 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Exe. Pt. No. 114 of 2024 Decided on : 01.01.2025 Rajesh Kumar and others. …Petitioners Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Dheeraj Kumar Vashishat, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner apprised the Court that though the services of the petitioners have been regularized after one year, as from the date of their initial joining on contract basis, however, as far as arrears are concerned, they have not been paid. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents-Corporation submitted that the arrear shall be paid in terms of the judgment, on or before 31.03.2025. His statement is taken on record. 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:131 3. In view of the above, these proceedings are closed, but with liberty to the petitioner to file an application for revival, if needful is not done by the respondents-Corporation, by the said date. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 01, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)