Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19584-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3342 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Ruchi Rai Respondent :- District Magistrate Distt. Lucknow And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aviral Chandra,Sudheer Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard Sri Aviral Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioner as also Sri Alok Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ashok Kumar singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opp. party Nos. 3 and 4. By means of this writ petition, Borrower has challanged the order passed under Section 14 of the Secularization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act 2002). Such petition at the behest of the borrower is not maintainable. The law in this regard has been discussed in the judgment dated 25.10.2024 passed in Writ C No. 8867 of 2024 (Bank of Baroda Vs. State of U.P. and 8 others). Remedy for the petitioner is under Section 17 of the Act 2002. As regards the contention that the petitioner is ready to pay the due amount, there is a stage for it as prescribed under Rule 13 of the Act 2002, but we say no more. The petitioner can approach the concerned Bank, if so chooses. with the above observations, this writ petition is disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 8.4.2025 A.Nigam Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench