KALLO v. NAIB TEHSILDAR, BACCHRAWAN, TEHSIL MAHARAJGANJ, RAEBARELI AND OTHERS
A227/1890/2025 · 2025-04-05
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132031 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132031 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19030 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1890 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kallo Respondent :- Naib Tehsildar, Bacchrawan, Tehsil Maharajganj, Raebareli And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private- respondent(s), if any, is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief:-
"Issue a, order or direction commanding the opposite party no - 1 to decide the mutation application under section 34 of U. P. Revenue Act, Computer case no-T - 202410580105374 ( Kallo Versus Permeshwardeen) exepeditiously within stipulated time, in the interest of justice." Considering the fact that the case in issue relates to mutation and as per Rule 34 (7) of U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 framed under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, the mutation proceedings, being summary in nature, ought to have been decided within 45 days, if there is no dispute and if there is dispute, then the same should preferably be decided within 90 days, this Court is of the view that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the present petition pending. In view of above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1/Naib Tehsildar, Bacchrawan Tehsil-Maharajganj, District Raebareli to consider and decide the Computer case No. T- 202410580105374 (Kallo Versus Permeshwardeen) most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the party to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of three months from the next date fixed in the case. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 5.4.2025 ML/- Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench