DR. FARHAT BANO BEIGH AND ORS. v. ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AND ORS.
WP(C)/230/2020 · 2025-11-03
Vinod Chatterji Koul
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13202 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13202 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 54 Regular Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 230/2020 c/w CCP(S) 77/2020, CCP(S) 638/2021, WP(C) 1120/2021
DR. FARHAT BANO BEIGH AND ORS.
…Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Jahangir Iqbal Ganai, Sr. Advocate Mr. Arif Sikander, Advocate Vs.
ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AND ORS.
...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Ilyas Laway, GA Mr. Jahingeer A Dar, GA
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL-JUDGE
ORDER 03.11.2025
Counsel for the petitioners has relied upon a Judgment passed in a batch of writ petitions with lead case bearing WP(C) no.708/2023 titled Mushtaq Ahmad Shah vs. University of Kashmir and others, in support of their contention. The only question to determine as to whether while making academic arrangements, persons, who have already been engaged for such purpose, could be replaced by new ones. This issue has been considered and decided in afore-cited judgement, which is not being disputed by learned counsel appearing for the respondents. Therefore, instant petitions, being covered in terms of the aforesaid Judgment, are disposed of, accordingly on the same lines. In view of the disposal of the writ petitions, the contempt petitions do not survive and are closed, as such.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE SRINAGAR 03.11.2025
“Imtiyaz”
Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 12.11.2025 10:37