Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13201 (JK)

FAYAZ AHMAD MALIK v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (HOME) AND ORS

WP(C)/2797/2025 · 2025-11-14

Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 82 SUPPLEMENTARY CAUSE LIST-I HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 2797/2025 CM(7405/2025) Fayaz Ahmad Malik. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Mohd. Saleem Mir, Advocate. Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Faheem Nisar Shah, GA. CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge. ORDER 14.11.2025 01. After arguing for a while when confronted with the maintainability of the instant writ petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits the petitioner would feel satisfied if the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to accord due consideration to the representation alleged to have been filed by the petitioner on 15th September, 2025, within some reasonable time frame. 02. On the asking of the court Mr. Faheem Nisar Shah, learned Government Advocate caused appearance and is not averse to the disposal of the present writ petition at this stage or else to the prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner. However, he submits that the representation of the petitioner would be considered strictly in accordance with law and the rules governing the field. 03. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the record. 04. Since, an innocuous prayer has been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, as such, no fruitful purpose would be achieved by keeping the instant writ petition pending and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is taken up for final disposal at this stage and the same is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the respondents to accord due consideration to the representation alleged to have been filed by the petitioner on 15th September, 2025, strictly as per law and the rules occupying the field, within a period of four weeks from the date copy of this order along with copy of writ petition and the annexures appended thereto, is made available to the respondents. 05. The order of consideration which is likely to be passed by the respondents be conveyed to the petitioner through registered post. 06. Writ petition disposed of along with connected application in the manner indicated above. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge SRINAGAR: 14.11.2025 <HAMID=