1 2025:CGHC:36049-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 716 of 2023 Ashok Agrawal S/o Jaiprakash Agrawal Aged About 45 Years R/o Meera Sadi Center Saraipali, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Superintendent of Police, Mahasamund, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. 2. Station House Officer Police Station, Sraipali, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. 3. Sadaram Patel S/o Salikram Patel Aged About 58 Years Village - Rimji, Police Station - Singhoda, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ...Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Ms. Priyanka Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. Soumya Rai, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Roop Ram Naik, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 25 .07.2025 1. Heard Ms. Priyanka Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Soumya Rai, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.07.26 11:37:48 +0530 2 respondents No. 1 & 2/State and Mr. Roop Ram Naik, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 3. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “(i) This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the FIR No. 13 of 2023 under Sections 294, 323, 341 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code in Police Station Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.) and the subsequent and consequential proceedings initiated pursuant thereto in the interest of justice. (ii) This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate direction to respondent authorities to conduct an independent and fair investigation of the case against the petitioner. (iii) To grant any other relief which may suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be allowed.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she does not want to press this petition further as the charges have already been framed by the learned trial Court against the petitioner and the trial is in progress. 4. Learned State counsel and learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 3 also endorse the said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan