ARUN KUMAR TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SUGAR INDUSTRY AND CANE DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/3621/2025 · 2025-04-05
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131995 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131995 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19169 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3621 of 2025 Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Sugar Industry And Cane Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aprajita Bansal,Anilesh Tewari,Surabhi Rawat Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Aakash Singh,Indu Prakash Singh Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 and 3, Shri I.P. Singh, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and Shri Sudhanshu Chauhan for respondent No.4. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer to the extent that the representation of the petitioner may be directed to be decided by respondent no.2. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to this innocuous prayer. Perused the record. Considering the above, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation to respondent no.2 i.e. U.P. Co-operative Sugar Factories Federation Limited through its Managing Director within two weeks' from today. If the petitioner submits a fresh representation, the respondent
no.2 shall decide the same within four weeks' thereafter, by passing a speaking and reasoned order. While taking decision on the representation in case there are any admitted amount such as EPF etc., the same shall be paid to the petitioner. Order Date :- 5.4.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench