Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13197 (UTT)

DINESH CHAND v. NARESH KUMAR

CLR/143/2019 · 2025-09-17

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CLR NO. 143 of 2019 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Tarun Lakhera, learned counsel for the revisionists. 2. On 14.10.2024, the counsel for the revisionist Mr. Tarun Lakhera apprised the Coordinate Bench that Vinay Chand Kar, the power of attorney holder of the revisionists has already died and the coordinate Bench granted four weeks’ time to take necessary instructions. 3. Today, Mr. Lakhera, learned counsel submits that the revisionist has taken the entire record from him and he has no instruction on this, and, even otherwise, the instant revision was filed through power of attorney holder who is no more. 4. In such view of the matter when the power of attorney holder already died this revision should not be entertained. 5. Accordingly, present revision is dismissed as infructuous. 6. All pending applications are also dismissed. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 17.09.2025 Parul