Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 131963 (MAD)

Arumugam v. The Superintendent of Police

WP(MD)/9531/2025 · 2025-04-07

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.9531 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.04.2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL W.P(MD)No.9531 of 2025 Arumugam ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Thoothukudi and District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Thoothukudi South(Thenpakam) Police Station, Thoothukudi and District. 3. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch Police Station, Thoothukudi and District. 4. Mahendra Kumar ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1 and 2nd respondents to take appropriate action on complaint dated 11.03.2025. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.9531 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.R. Jegadeeswaran, For Respondent : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Nos.1 to 3 Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate action on complaint dated 11.03.2025. 2.According to the petitioner, there is a money dispute pending between the petitioner and the fourth respondent. Therefore, the petitioner lodged a complaint as against the fourth respondent, but no action was taken. Hence this petition. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police would submit that the respondents 2 and 3 have not received no any complaint from the petitioner. The petitioner sent the complaint only to the first respondent and same is under consideration. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.9531 of 2025 4.Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for in this petition, this Court, without even issuing notice to the private respondent, is inclined to pass order. 5.According to the petitioner, he lodged the complaint, dated 11.03.2025, but the same has not been considered. The first respondent admitted the receipt of the petitioner's complaint. 6.Therefore, the first respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's complaint and dispose of the same within a period of fifteen days from the date of this order, in accordance with law. 7.With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 07.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No LR 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.9531 of 2025 To 1. The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Thoothukudi and District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Thoothukudi South(Thenpakam) Police Station, Thoothukudi and District. 3. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch Police Station, Thoothukudi and District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.9531 of 2025 P.DHANABAL , J. LR W.P(MD)No.9531 of 2025 07.04.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis