SATYA NARAYAN YADAV v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AYODHYA DISTRICT AYODHYA AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/3274/2025 · 2025-04-05
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131962 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131962 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19079-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3274 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satya Narayan Yadav Respondent :- District Magistrate Ayodhya District Ayodhya And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. The opposite parties no. 4 and 5, as alleged, are interfering in the possession of the petitioner on Gata No. 386. If it is so, then the petitioner should take recourse to the remedy under Civil / Criminal / Revenue law. Writ jurisdiction is not the appropriate remedy. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 5.4.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench