VANSHRAJ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 8 OTHERS
WPIL/313/2025 · 2025-04-07
Pankaj Bhatia
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131875 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131875 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19247 Court No. - 6 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 313 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vanshraj Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Umesh Pratap Singh,Ashutosh Tiwari,Ashvini Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following relief:
"(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding the opp. parties specially opp. party no.4 to ensure removal of encroachment, made over Public Utility Land, in the terms of judgment and order dated 27.05.2023, passed by Tehsildar-Ikauna, District Shrawasti, passed in case no.5737 of 2022, "Gaon Sabha Vs. Kariya", Case No.5739 of 2022 "Gaon Sabha Vs. Maksood Ali", Case No.5740 of 2022 "Gaon Sabha Vs. Juguru". Case No.5738 of 2022 "Gaon Sabha Vs. Smt. Aliya" and Case No.5741 of 2022
"Gaon Sabha Vs. Roj Ali", filed under section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously, say within time framed period, as
directed by this Hon'ble Court, as contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition, in the interest of justice."
3. Considering the fact that the provision for execution is prescribed under Clause 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual, the present petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file an appropriate application under the said provision, which shall be disposed of in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 7.4.2025 Ashutosh Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench