KHWAJA MASOOD AHMAD SHAH v. U.P.JAL NIGAM (URBAN ) THRU. MANAGING DIRECTOR LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/3597/2025 · 2025-04-09
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131869 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131869 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19888 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3597 of 2025 Petitioner :- Khwaja Masood Ahmad Shah Respondent :- U.P.Jal Nigam (Urban ) Thru. Managing Director Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Savita Jain Counsel for Respondent :- Rishabh Kapoor,Vinay Shankar Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Ms. Savita Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for opposite parties No. 1 to 3 and Sri Vinay Shankar, learned counsel for opposite party No.
4. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
"(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties to unfreeze his bank account and permit him to withdraw the amount of arrears of VI Pay Commission expeditiously or within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. (ii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties to settle the medical reimbursement claim submitted by the petitioner on 12.11.2024 expeditiously or within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation /application dated 12.11.2024 (Annexure No.8) to the competent authority but to no avail. He has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.1 i.e., Managing Director, U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban), Lucknow and a direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. 5.
Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.1 i.e., Managing Director, U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban), Lucknow ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation/application, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 6. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 9.4.2025 Reena/- (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench