Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:22940] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4357/2025 Samaydeen S/o Kallu, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Gangora, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg (Raj.). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Liyakat Khan for Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendar Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.)
Judgment 06/06/2025
1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.55/2025 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, Rajasthan for the offence(s) under Section(s) 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) 308(2), 61(2) of B.N.S and 66(D) of I.T Act.
2.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner is in judicial custody since 08.03.2025 and conclusion of the trial will take considerable time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.
[2025:RJ-JP:22940] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4357/2025]
4. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the present case, and perused the record as also arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties, since petitioner is in judicial custody since 08.03.2025 and conclusion of trial will take time, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioner namely Samaydeen S/o Kallu, is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in similar offence(s) during currency of the bail granted by this court. The petitioner is further directed to mark their presence in the concerned Police Station in the 1st week of every month, till trial is concluded. If breach of any of these conditions, is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the Trial Court to cancel the bail granted to petitioner by this Court.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.)),J DIKSHA MISHRA /27