Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13185 (JK)

JAVID AHMAD BHAT v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH. COMMRSECTY TO (REVENUE) AND ORS

WP(C)/2683/2025 · 2025-11-03

Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 09 REGULAR CAUSE LIST HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 2683/2025 CM(7110/2025) Javid Ahmad Bhat. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Mir Umar, Advocate. Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Others. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Waseem Gul, GA. CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge. ORDER 03.11.2025 01. The instant writ petition has been filed on mere apprehension as no cause of action has accrued to the petitioner to file the instant writ petition. 02. When confronted with the maintainability issue of the instant writ petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner could not satisfy this Court by any justifiable explanation as regards the accrual of cause of action in the instant matter. 03. It is settled preposition of law that a writ petition filed prematurely, without any cause of action, is not maintainable in law. In that view of the matter, the instant writ petition having been filed on mere apprehension is dismissed in limine as being not maintainable. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge SRINAGAR: 03.11.2025 <HAMID=