APHC010158262025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3353/2025 Between: 1.MALE SREEKANTHA REDDY, S/O.RAMA KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O.D.NO. 1-1190-30, S.V.NAGAR, OPPANJANEYASWAMI TEMPLE, N.G.O.COLONY, KADIRI, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 2.BAPANPALLI SHAIK MAQBOOL, S/O.SHEIK ALLA BAKSH BAPANPALLI, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.9-160-4, MADANPALLI ROAD, KADIRI, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 3.ATTAR CHAND BASHA, S/O.ATTAR ABDUL KHADER, S/O.58 YEARS, OCC EX-MLA, KADIRI CONSTITUENCY, PJO.D.NO.L 1-300-A, BANDU SAHIB STREET VALISAB ROAD, KADIRI TOWN, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 4.PARKE SHADAK BASHA, S/O.LATE PARKE MAHABOOB SAB, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO. 10-698-1, NAGRAJ STREET, KADIRI, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 5.PARKE SHAMEER BASHA, .S/O. LATE PARKE MAHABOOB SAB, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO. 10-69S-1, NAGRAJ STREET, KADIRI, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH SHO, GANDLAPENTA POLICE STATION, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AT HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI. 2.BUKYA RAVI KUMAR NAIK, S/O. LATE GAUGE NAIK, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC WATCHMAN AT SOLAR POWER PROJECT, R/O.GAJUJAVARIPALLI PEDDA THANDA VILLAGE, GANDLAPENTA MANDAL SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 3.BUKYA LAKSHMI DEVI, S/O.BUKYA GOPAL NAIK, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCCMPTC, R/O. D.NO.7-19, GAJULAVARIPALLI PEDDA THANDA VILLAGE, GANDLAPENTA MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 4.BUKYA GOPAL NAIK, S/O. GANGLE NAIK AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.7-19,GAJULAVARIPALLI PEDDA THANDA VILLAGE, GANDLAPENTA MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.B.ABHAY SIDDHANTH MOOTHA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2.PHANI VISWANATH CHALLA The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous and hence the matter may be dismissed as infructuous. Recording the above submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. ________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 01.08.2025 VTS