LEMINA K. MARAK v. VIJAY KUMAR MANTRI, IAS AND 6 ORS.
Cont.Cas(C)/91/2024 · 2025-03-05
H S Thangkhiew
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1318 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1318 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 44 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Cont.Cas(C) No. 91 of 2024
Date of Decision: 05.03.2025 Smti Lemina K. Marak
…. Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. Shri Vijay Kumar Mantri, IAS Commissioner & Secretary, Education Department, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong.
2. Shri Banteilang J. Kharshandi, Deputy Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Education Department, Shillong
3. Shri Swapnil Tembe, IAS Director of School Education & Literacy, Shillong, Meghalaya
4. Shri Rod Tenang K. Sangma, Inspector of School, West Garo Hills Tura/ District School Education Officer, West Garo Hills Tura
5. Smti S. Biswas, Deputy Inspector of Schools, Baghamara, South Garo Hills District, Meghalaya
6. Shri Samuel K. Sangma, Sub-Divisional School Education Officer, Willimnagar, East Garo Hills District, Meghalaya
7. Shri Calvin Harris Kharshiing, Principal Accountant General (A&E), Shillong East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya … Respondent(s) 2025:MLHC:141
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge
Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. T.N. Marak, Adv.
For the Respondent(s) : Mrs. T. Yangi B, AAG with
Mr. H. Abraham, GA (For R 1-6)
Ms. E.B. Passah, Adv. (For R 7)
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press: (ORAL)
1. A communication dated 17.02.2025, has been produced before this Court indicating the fact that the ex-post facto approval to regularize the service of (Late) Nefarine K. Sangma, has since been approved.
2. Mrs. T. Yangi B, learned AAG assisted by Mr. H. Abraham, learned GA for the respondents Nos. 1 to 6, submits that the as the process of regularization will be completed, the other benefits to which the writ petitioner is entitled to, will be consequential in due process.
2025:MLHC:141
3. Having perused the letter dated 17.02.2025, and on hearing the counsel for parties, it is seen that there has been no willful violation of the orders of this Court.
4. It is however, expected that the regularization and release of terminal benefits, will be done at the earliest.
5. Accordingly, this contempt application stands closed.
JUDGE
Meghalaya 05.03.2025
“V. Lyndem-PS”
2025:MLHC:141 Digitally signed by VALENTINO LYNDEM Date: 2025.03.05 16:07:28 IST