W.P(MD)No.9507 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.04.2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL W.P(MD)No.9507 of 2025 Vinobi ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2. The Inspector of Police, Pappakudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District. 3. Duraichi 4. Mari 5. Krishnammal 6. Thangam ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to take necessary action against the 3rd and 4th 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.9507 of 2025 respondent and returned her money based on the petitioner's representation dated 10.11.2024 made to the 1st and 2nd respondents by registered post, due within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Veerapandi, For R1 and R2 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the first and second respondents to take necessary action against the third and fourth respondents and return her money based on the petitioner's representation dated 10.11.2024 sent to the respondents 1 and 2. 2.According to the petitioner, she lodged a complaint against the respondents 3 to 6 before the second respondent, but no action was taken. Thereafter, she sent the representation dated 15.03.2025 and the same has also not been considered. Hence this petition. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.9507 of 2025 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police would submit that the petitioner's representation was already considered and closed on 26.03.2025. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication in this matter. 4.Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for in this petition, this Court, without even issuing notice to the private respondents, is inclined to pass order. 5.Since the petitioner's representation was already considered and closed on 26.03.2025, nothing survives for further adjudication in this matter. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the closure of the complaint in the manner known to law, if she is aggrieved. 07.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No LR 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.9507 of 2025 To 1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2. The Inspector of Police, Pappakudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.9507 of 2025 P.DHANABAL , J. LR W.P(MD)No.9507 of 2025 07.04.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis