Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 131790 (ALL)

SHIV KAILASH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. ENERGRY DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS

WRIC/3233/2025 · 2025-04-09

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19942-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3233 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shiv Kailash Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Energry Deptt., Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saurabh Gautam,Ritu Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Aprajita Bansal Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard Shri Saurabh Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Ms. Aprajita Bansal, learned counsel for the Electricity Corporation. The petitioner challenges a notice by the S.D.O., Khargapur, Lucknow demanding Rs.347269 and odd as electricity dues. Learned counsel for the petitioner was unable to put forth any ground much less an acceptable one which may be the basis for challenging the same and which could persuade us to interfere in the matter. On a perusal of the writ petition we find that petitioner wants a correction of the electricity Bill but which bill he wants to be got corrected is not clear. Nevertheless, if he is raising billing a dispute let him move an application before the opposite party no. 3 in terms of Para 6.5 which of the U.P. Electricity Supply Code, 2005 which shall be looked into and a decision shall be taken within a period of four weeks on submission of such application. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 9.4.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench