Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20053-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3216 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohammad Idrish Khan Respondent :- Collector, Raebareli And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Somesh Tripathi,Anuj Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. The petitioner has initiated some proceedings for demarcation of records on 10.02.2025 which is still pending. If it is so, the petitioner's counsel should prefer petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India rather than writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in view of decision in Writ-C No.10001 of 2024 (Vidya Vati vs. District Magistrate District Amethi and 19 others), wherein we have referred to a decision on the subject rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court where the Revenue Court has been held to be amenable to the jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty aforesaid. . (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 9.4.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench