HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 138 of 2025 WITH SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 52 of 2025 WITH SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 53 of 2025 WITH SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 58 of 2025 Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ran Vijay Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ramesh Kumar Dwivedi, C.S.C., Durga Prasad Shukla, Prashant Dwivedi Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ran Vijay Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Onkar Nath Singh Rathore, C.S.C. Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ran Vijay Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : O.P. Tiwari, C.S.C., Sarvesh Kumar Dubey Secy. U.P. Basic Education Board Prayagraj And 6 Others .....Appellant(s) Ravi Pratap Singh Bhadauriya And 31 Others .....Respondent(s) Distt. Basic Education Officer, Bahraich And 2 Ors .....Appellant(s) Nisha Singh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Distt. Basic Education Officer Unnao And Another .....Appellant(s) Smt. Garima Shukla And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) WITH SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 78 of 2025 WITH SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 130 of 2025 WITH SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 131 of 2025 SPLAD No. 138 of 2025 2 Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ran Vijay Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Vinay Misra, C.S.C. Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ran Vijay Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ravindra Kumar Yadava, C.S.C., Mohd. Ali Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ran Vijay Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Amit Mishra, C.S.C. Versus Secy.Board Of Basic Education, Prayagraj And 2 Others .....Appellant(s) Ramesh Kumar Shukla And 37 Others .....Respondent(s) The Secetary, U.P. Basic Education Board Prayagraj And Another .....Appellant(s) Veer Pratap Singh And 85 Others .....Respondent(s) Distt. Basic Education Officer Distt. Shravasti And Another .....Appellant(s) Poonam Mishra And 37 Others .....Respondent(s) Basic Education Officer,Hardoi And Another .....Appellant(s) WITH SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 132 of 2025 WITH SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 171 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. C.M. Application No. 01 of 2025 C.M. Application No. 01 of 2025 C.M. Application No. 01 of 2025 C.M. Application No. 01 of 2025 C.M. Application No. 01 of 2025 C.M. Application No. 01 of 2025 C.M. Application No. 01 of 2025 SPLAD No. 138 of 2025 3 Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ran Vijay Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Dinesh Kumar, C.S.C. Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ran Vijay Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ravindra Kumar Yadava, C.S.C. Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ran Vijay Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Amit Mishra, C.S.C. Indravati Devi And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) The Secretary U.P. Basic Education Board Prayagraj And Another .....Appellant(s) Atul Premi And 123 Others .....Respondent(s) Secy. U.P. Basic Education Board, Prayagraj, And 2 Others .....Appellant(s) Phool Chand Gupta And 109 Others .....Respondent(s) C.M. Application No. 01 of 2025 C.M. Application No. 01 of 2025 1. These are applications for condonation of delay in filing the special appeal supported with an affidavit. 2. Cause shown in the accompanying affidavits are found to be sufficient. 3. Accordingly, the condonation of delay applications are allowed and the delay in filing these appeals is condoned. Memo of Appeal 1. Learned Counsel for the parties, namely Shri Ran Vijay Singh, learned Counsel for the appellants and Shri O.P. Tiwari, learned Counsel for the private opposite parties-writ petitioner, are ad idem, that the issues involved are covered by a Division Bench judgment of this Court dated 30.04.2025 passed in Special Appeal No. 652 of 2024 and connected appeals, against which, Special Leave Petition filed by the State has been dismissed on 13.08.2025. 2. We have gone through the said judgment of the Division Bench and agree with the said decision. 3. We, accordingly, dispose of these appeals in terms of the said judgment dated 30.04.2025 passed in Special Appeal No. 652 of 2024 and connected appeals, meaning thereby, the private opposite parties shall be entitled to the benefit of the said judgment on the same terms with a corresponding obligation upon the appellants. 4. Let the judgment be complied positively within a period of six weeks. August 27, 2025 Lokesh Kumar SPLAD No. 138 of 2025 4 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench