HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1005085 of 2004 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J. 1. Vide order dated 28.4.2025, the writ petition was dismissed on behalf of petitioner No.2. 2. Seen the office report dated 12.9.2025, whereby it has been reported that undelivered cover of registered post card notice issued to petitioner No.1 has not been received back nor any Vakalatnama has been filed till date, hence, service of notice is deemed sufficient upon petitioner No.1 in view of provision contained under Chapter VIII Rule 12 Explanation II of the High Court Rules. 3. Case is called out. None for petitioner No.1. 4. Accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, is vacated. September 18, 2025 Gautam Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : P.L.Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Irshad Ali,J.) Habeeb Hussain And Another .....Petitioner(s) Additional Distt. Judge .Hardoi And 4 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM TECKCHANDANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench