- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:10849-DB CCC No. 35 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 35 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. TULJANSA S/O LAKSHMANSA BASUDE, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, SECONDARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT (GRADE-II) LANGUAGE ASSISTANT (HINDI) GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL SAKSHIHALLI, SIRA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 137. …COMPLAINANT (BY SMT. V.A. MANJULA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MADHUSUDAN M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. V. RASHMI MAHESH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. DR. K.V.THRILOK CHANDRA COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS Digitally signed by CHAITHANYA K Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:10849-DB CCC No. 35 of 2025 NEW PUBLIC OFFICES K.R.CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 001. …ACCUSED 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY M.S. BUILDING, BENGALUR-560 001. …PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI. NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKAR, AGA) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO TAKE AN APPROPRIATE CONTEMPT ACTION ON THE ACCUSED FOR THEIR WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP NO.20303/2023 (S-KSAT) DATED 31.08.2024 (VIDE ANNEXURE-A). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:10849-DB CCC No. 35 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) Learned advocate Smt. V.A. Manjula appearing for learned advocate Mr..M..Madhusudan for the complainant stated that the order under contempt is complied with as the competent authority has issued an endorsement. 2. In view of the statement, the present contempt petition does not survive. 3. It was requested to the court that liberty may be reserved for the petitioner-complainant to challenge the endorsement on merits, if so advised. 4. Such liberty is reserved, however in that regard the court does not express any opinion on merits. 5. The petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE PGG/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54