Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19279 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3712 of 2025 Petitioner :- Seema Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Medical And Health Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Misra,Mrs. Anju Raghuvansh,Pratyush Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Gaurav Mehrotra Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2 and Shri Utsav Mishra, Advocate, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.3, which is taken on record. 2. The petitioner, through this writ petition, has prayed for the following relief:- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully and humbly prayed that in the interest of justice and the above circumstances, this Hon'ble Court may very kindly be graciously be pleased to: "I. To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus whereby this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to command the opposite party to issue an appointment letter in favor of the petitioner on the post of Health Worker as the petitioner possess all the requisite qualifications for the said post in question; II. To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus whereby this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petitioner to work on the post and pay her salary accordingly. III. To issue a writ order or direction in appropriate nature as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the circumstances of the case, in favour of the petitioner; IV. To award the cost of the writ petition in favour of the petitioner." 3. Learned Counsel for the respondents no.3 submits that if the petitioner files a representation to opposite party no.3 the same shall be considered and decided as per law. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that liberty may be given to the petitioner to file a fresh representation to opposite party no.3. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to this innocuous prayer. 6. Perused the record. 7. Considering the above, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation to respondent no.3 i.e. Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Services Selection Commission, Lucknow within two weeks' from today. If the petitioner submits a fresh representation, the respondent no.3 shall decide the same within four weeks' thereafter, by passing a speaking and reasoned order. Order Date :- 7.4.2025 Madhu D.R/P.S Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench