MOHD. ARSHAD SIDDIQUI (PROPOSED NAME RAKESH MAURYA ) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/3208/2025 · 2025-04-04
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131740 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131740 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18862-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3208 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohd. Arshad Siddiqui (Proposed Name Rakesh Maurya ) Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prabhakar Mishra,Dharm Raj Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard.
2. The petitioner wants consideration of his application, which is allegedly referrable to Section 8 of the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021 followed by consequential action under Section 9(5) of the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021, however, learned Standing Counsel states that the application of the petitioner is not according to the prescribed proforma, which is a form mentioned in Schedule I of the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021.
3. The petitioner may, if he so chooses, submit the aforesaid form or such other forms, as may be required as per the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021 and Rules, if any, made thereunder, at the earliest, whereupon the same shall be processed by the competent authority and a decision be taken within a time, as prescribed under the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021. 4.The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 4.4.2025 Arnima Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench