Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13174 (GAU)

SUMPI DEKA AND 9 ORS. v. PREETAM SAIKIA AND ANR.

Cont.Cas(C)/340/2020 · 2025-02-23

Michael Zothankhuma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010112662020 2025:GAU-AS:1904 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/340/2020 SUMPI DEKA AND 9 ORS. D/O. HARGOBINDA DEKA, VILL. AND P.O. RUPIABATHAN, P.S. BELSOR, DIST. NALBARI, ASSAM, PIN-781306. 2: ASHFIA RASUL D/O. RUPCHAND ALI VILL. AND P.O. BARNI P.S. HAJO DIST. KAMRUP (R) ASSAM PIN-781102. 3: SAMSUL ALI S/O. SAHNUR ALI VILL. CHOURAKARA P.O. SONESWAR P.S. KAMALPUR DIST. KAMRUP (R) ASSAM PIN-781382. 4: MAIDUL ISLAM S/O. MAHSEN ALI VILL. AND P.O. JAMTOLA P.S. RANGIA DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN-781354. 5: NAJMA BEGUM D/O. RIAZUDDIN AHMED VILL. AND P.O. BARNI P.S. HAJO DIST. KAMRUP (R) Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM PIN-781102. 6: ALTAF ALI S/O. ASRAF ALI VILL. AND P.O. LOHARKATHA P.S. MUKALMUA DIST. NALBARI ASSAM PIN-781126. 7: ABUL HUSSAIN S/O. EYAS ALI VILL. SUTARKUCHI P.O. ADABARI P.S. MUKALMUA DIST. NALBARI ASSAM PIN-781126. 8: ABHISHEK TALUKDAR S/O. SANCHIT TALUKDAR VILL. BABUPATTI P.O. SIVASAGAR DIST. SIVASAGAR ASSAM PIN-785640. 9: SAFIKUR RAHMAN C/O. LT. RUSTOM ALI VILL. MONIARI P.O. MONIARI TINIALI P.S. PALASHBARI DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781125. 10: UMMEHANI KHATUN D/O. SULTAN ALI VILL. NO.2 PALABARTARI P.O. AND P.S. NAGARBERA DIST. KAMRUP (R) ASSAM PIN-781127 VERSUS PREETAM SAIKIA AND ANR. Page No.# 3/3 I.A.S., THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPTT. OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, ASSAM, ASSAM CIVIL SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM, PIN-781006. 2:BIJOYA CHOUDHURY THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN-781019 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K DUTTA, MR. B PURKAYASTHA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA ORDER 24.02.2025 Mr. B. Purkayastha, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the contempt petition can be closed, inasmuch as, the contempt case had been filed due to noncompliance with the interim order passed by this Court. However, as the main writ petition had been dismissed, nothing survives. Ms. S.M.T. Chistie, learned Standing Counsel, Elementary Education Department is present. On the prayer of Mr. B. Purkayastha, learned counsel for the petitioners, the contempt petition is accordingly closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant