Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
% \ APHC010156902025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) BP.»fj:
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8189 OF 2025 I o ; A* Between: Sivaraju Shalini, D/o Sivaraju Rambabu, Aged about 34 years R/o- D.No.6-19-22, G.Atchaiah Street Pradesh-520001 Kothapet, Vijayawada Andhra ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, A.P. State Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur Department of Home, District
2. The Director General of Police, A.P.Police Headquarters, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh
3. The Station House Officer-cum-Circle Inspector, Inkollu Police Station, Pusapadu Village, Inkollu, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Investigating officer-cum-Sub-lnspector Inkollu Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh. Inkollu Police Station ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the Respondent Police may be in not
#<* filing the Charge sheet in the Crime in FIR.No.22 OF 2022 on the file of Inkollu Police Station, Pusapadu Village, Prakasam District despite the lapse of three years (3) as illegal, arbitrary and guarantees and consequently direct the Respondent Police specifically Respondent No.3 and Respondent No.4 to complete the investigations forthwith and file the Charge sheet before the competent court in connection with the crime in FIR.No.22 OF 2022 dated 09/02/2022. on the file of Inkollu Police Station, Pusapadu Village, Bapatia District in accordance with law. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI UMESH CHANDRA P V G Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: contrary to Constitutional
APHC010156902025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8189/2025 Between:
1.SIVARAJU SHALINI. D/0, SIVARAJU RAMBABU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/O-D.NO.6-19-22, G.ATCHAIAH STREET, KOTHAPET, VIJAYAWADA ANDHRA PRADESH-520001 ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, A.P.STATE SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, A.P.POLICE HEADQUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICERCUMCIRCLE INSPECTOR, INKOLLU INKOLLU, PRAKASAM POLICE STATION,PUSAPADU VILLAGE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
4.THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER CUMSUBLNSPECTOR, INKOLLU PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA POLICE STATION, INKOLLU PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularlyone in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the Respondent
2 Police in not filing the Charge sheet in the Crime in FIR No 22 OF 2022 the file of Inkollu Police Station, Pusapadu Village, Prakasam District despite the lapse of three years (3) as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Constitutional guarantees and consequently direct the Respondent Police specifically for^fh 'P® investigations forthwith and file the Charge sheet before the competent court in connection pie star® P ? 09/02/2022.
09/02/2022. on the file of Inkollu Police Station, Pusapadu Village, Bapatia District i to pass on m accordance with law and lA NO: 1 OF ?()9Fi Petition under Section 151 CPC in the affidavit filed i praying that in the circumstances stated m support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to amend the prayer in the Writ Petition No 8189 OF 2025 to of Wnt of Mandamus directing the Superintendent of Police who is arrayed as Respondent No. 5 in the present Writ Petition 8189 of 2025 to reopen the c osedFIR.No.22 OF 2022 on the file of Inkollu Police Station, rs:;d: Village Prakasam District despite the lapse of three years (3) alto reinvestigate into the crime and file the chargesheet forthwith before the jurisdictional court in accordance with law and pass iA NO: 2 OF 209!^ in the • rfa circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit the petitioner herein to implead the propol Respondent No,5 in the Writ Petition i.e. W.P.No.8189 of 2025, pending before this Hon.'bie Court, in the interests of justice and ^ ® Counsel for the Petitioner;
1.UMESH CHANDRA PVG Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME pass
3 The Court made the following;
ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer:
“...to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the Respondent Police in not filing the Charge sheet in the Crime in FIR.No.22 OF 2022 on the file of Inkollu Police Station, Pusapadu Village. Prakasam District despite the lapse of three years (3) as illegal, arbitrary and guarantees and consequently direct the Respondent Police specifically Respondent No.3 and Respondent No.4 to complete the investigations forthwith and file the Charge sheet before the competent court in connection with the crime in FIR.No.22 OF 2022 dated 09/02/2022. on the file of Inkollu Police Station, Pusapadu Village, Bapatia District in accordance with law and to pass....” contrary to Constitutional
2. Heard Sri Umesh Chandra PVG, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that the investigation is completed in this case and the matter is referred as civil in nature.
3.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that they have sent the documents to forensic lab seeking opinion of the expert and they have received a report stating that it is a forgery one. Learned counsel would further submit civil case is pending between the parties. Recording the same, this writ petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to recourse his remedy before the appropriate forum, according to law.
5.
4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P.State Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District The Director General of Police, A.P Police Headquarters, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh The Station House Officer-cum-Circle Inspector, Inkollu Police Station, Pusapadu Village, Inkollu, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh. The Investigating officer cum-Sub-inspector, Inkollu Police Station, Inkollu Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh. One CC to Sri. Umesh Chandra P V G Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Home High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CD Copies
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. gsc
|r HIGH COURT DATED:25/07/2025
ORDER WP NO. 8189 OF 2025 ^ of andw^ 2 0 SEP 2025 Co/’ ^ Currem ssciion DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS