Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 131714 (ALL)

GHANSHYAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. U.P. GOVT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/3206/2025 · 2025-04-07

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19286-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3206 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ghanshyam Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Govt. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahesh Chandra Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard Shri Mahesh Chandra Shukla, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Shri Ratnesh Chandra, learned Counsel for the Lucknow Development Authority and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner claims compensation in respect of land bearing Gata No.1143, 1144, 1149, 1153 and 1154 situated at Village Qila Mohammad Nagar, Pargana and Tehsil Lucknow new Tehsil Sarojni Nagar, District-Lucknow which was acquired by the Lucknow Development Authority as alleged in the year 1984-85. The land as claimed was recorded in the name of the predecessors in interest of the petitioner. On being asked, as to whether any award has been passed, the Counsel for the petitioner feigned ignorance. We cannot interfere in such a matter after such delay especially in the absence of any award, which may indicate as to whether the petitioner or his predecessors in interest had any right in respect thereof or not. 3. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the matter before the authorities concerned or seek such other remedy as may be prescribed in law. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 7.4.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench