ATEEK AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.
BAIL/2838/2025 · 2025-04-29
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131700 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131700 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25183 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2838 of 2025 Applicant :- Ateek Ahmad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Prabhat Dwivedi,Dharmendra Kumar Pandey,Saurabh Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Aditya Nishad,Jaikaran,Nikhil Dixit,Samrat Gupta Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Saurabh Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Miss Nikita Mishra, the learned A.G.A. and Sri Jaikaran, learned counel for the informant, who has filed a short counter-affidavit on behalf of the informant, which is taken on record. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 69 of 2025, under Section 69, B.N.S., Police Station Chinhat, District Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 23.02.2025 stating that the informant was aged 23 years. She was in a relationship with the applicant for the past one-and-a-half year and he repetitively made physical relations with her under allurement of marrying her, but thereafter he declined to marry her. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail-application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent having no cfriminal history and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 5. The informant has stated in the short counter-affidavit that she has settled her disputes with the applicant and she has no objection to the applicant being released on bail. 6. In view of the aforesaid affidavit filed by the informant, without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in the aforesaid crime. 7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 8. Let the applicant- Ateek Ahmad be released on bail in the
aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court.
(Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 29.4.2025 A.Nigam Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench