38 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CR-4089-2004 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.07.2025 SHREE SANATAN DHARAM MAHABIR DAL BATHIND …Petitioner V/S AMRIT LAL …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Aakash Singla, Advocate for Mr. Ashok Singla, Advocate for the respondent. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) This petition has been filed against the judgment dated 31.03.2004 passed by learned Appellate Authority, Bathinda vide which judgment dated 30.04.2002 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Divison), Bathinda was upheld, whereby the ejectment petition filed under Section 13 of East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 has been dismissed. Learned counsel for the respondent very fairly submits that present petition has become infructuous as the respondent has vacated the demised premises. In view of the above, present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) 11.07.2025 JUDGE Ajay Goswami Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No AJAY GOSWAMI 2025.07.14 18:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document